C-beauty global expansion scorecard published: Who leads, who lags

C-beauty global expansion scorecard published has been gaining momentum. Data shows that in Q2, top-brand concentration rose to 31%, and industry attention is clearly rising. This piece breaks down who leads, who lags using public information and platform data.

Supply-side changes are equally visible. Proya Lab’s layout in Hangzhou, together with pricing from new entrants, is driving this round of adjustment — and concentration is moving with it.

On the data side, top-brand concentration rose to 31%, with month-on-month improvement through Q2. This suggests who leads, who lags is a structural trend rather than short-term noise.

For practitioners, three directions follow: differentiate product and content back to R&D and supply chain; build localisation capability for markets such as Hangzhou; and treat compliance and data capability as the new moat.

Bottom line: c-beauty global expansion scorecard published is moving from concept to execution — who leads, who lags. Brands should review strategy before Q2 and prioritise channels and segments with higher certainty.

Related